|
Conference Papers | 2005 Victorian Conference Papers
PIGGING
OF THE LOBETHAL RISING MAIN
Mario
Capasso, Area
Coordinator Woodside
for SA Water
Sue Lefebvre, Manager
Fleurieu Operations
for SA Water
DOWNLOAD
(pdf
87 KB)
ABSTRACT
A
7.5 km long sewer rising main often burst at environmentally
sensitive points. Although sections of the main were
programmed to be replaced, pigging was a short term
solution to relieve pressure in the main. There were
numerous considerations during the planning of the pigging
project.
1.0
INTRODUCTION
The small town of Lobethal (population 5,000) is sewered
with the wastewater collected at one pump station and
pumped 7.5 kilometres to the lagoon-based wastewater
treatment plant. There were frequent failures of the
main leading to significant environmental incidents.
1.1
The Infrastructure
The main is 200 mm cast iron, rubber jointed, laid in
1964. The diameter increases to 250 mm where it becomes
a gravity main some three quarters of the way to the
treatment plant.
The
line volume of the main is 238 kL. Design pressure of
the pump station is static; 74 metres head, operating:
105 metres head and surge 154 metres head.
The
environment
The
lowest points of the main are at the creeks and drainage
lines traversed by the main, the most significant being
the Onkaparinga River, one of Adelaide's major catchment
Rivers. The low points are where pipe failures occur.
See attached map. Approximately seven bursts occurred
annually.

Figure 1: Pigging Stages
1.2 Diagnosis of the problem
Sections removed during repair revealed the internal
mortar of the cast/cement lined pipe a soft, sandy,
with no residual alkalinity varying from 0 to 6 mm in
thickness. The internal diameter of the pipe was also
found to be severely restricted as a result of build
up of sludge and corrosion products. The pipe failures
were a result of local external corrosion and pressure
surges which caused the pipe to crack longitudinally
at its weakest point.

Figure 2: Sludge Build-up in
Sewer
1.3 Possible solutions
An extreme solution to the problem of bursts is replacement
of sections of the main however due to the sludge build
up it was decided to pig the main. Additionally we fitted
a pressure sensor on the main so when a burst occurred
the drop in pipe pressure would cause pump station shut
down thus minimising environmental spillage.
2.0
PIGGING
Planning:
There were numerous considerations to be taken into
account when the decision to pig was made. Issues for
which we had a contingency were:
-
Volume of potable water needed to push the pig/s the
entire 7.5 kilometres.
- We
had to break the job into sections and do the pigging
in 3 stages.
- We
also took the opportunity to install valves where
we broke into the main so that the whole rising main
did not drain back to the pump station or the location
of a burst if a burst did occur.
Storage
of raw wastewater during a pigging exercise.
Obviously when we were pushing the pig up the main with
potable water (to minimise environmental damage if a
burst occurred) we had to store raw incoming wastewater.
The pump station is a decommissioned wastewater treatment
where 5 hours raw sewage could be stored in the 750
kL total emergency storage. We couldn't plan to fill
the entire storage in case there was a burst during
pigging and we had to factor in the time taken to repair
a burst in the past.
Could the treatment plant handle the extra sludge
loads? We had planned to desludge lagoons so
factored the extra loads in. Based on the thickness
of the coating on the main, we estimated 85 cubic metres
of solids would be pushed to the treatment plant.
We also notified all land owners who had the main through
their property and local Council. Following all the
planning we submitted the plans to EPA. They were advised
of the dates and came to have a look at the job when
it was underway
3.0
THE JOB
We
undertook the pigging with pigging experts, a company
based in Adelaide called Macro One.
The
pumps in dry well configuration could not supply the
pressure to push pigs through the network, so we used
a fire truck pump.
Since
we needed a considerable volume of water to push the
pig through, we decided to break the whole job into
stages, starting at the farthest third from the pump
station then going back towards the pump station away
from the Onkaparinga River.
Stage one Quarry Road to the WWTP had least environmental
risk but there was no reticulated water so we had to
use a sealed contained supplied by Macro One for water
to push the pig. We used this container to supply water
for all the stages.
Launch sites were chosen for ease of access and location
of stop valves so not too much of the line had to be
drained when we broke into it to install a pig launcher.
Note stage 2 was back to the pump station from Onkaparinga
Valley Road. This made it easier to retrieve the pigs.
Macro
One gave us a quote for the job and undertook the risk
analysis and developed procedures in conjunction with
us. We had three meetings with Macro One and drove the
length of the main which traversed private properties.
The
job continued over a period of eight days since there
had to be a gap between stages when the stored wastewater
could be cleared to allow an empty storage for each
stage since the pump station pumps had to be off when
the pigs were in the system pushed by fire truck pump.
Each stage consisted of two to three piggings whereby
we started with soft pigs then graduated to pigs with
a more scouring effect. A liquid waste removalist was
used to dispose of the wastewater and refill the water
container. They
were placed on-call for the duration of the pigging.

Figure 3 Examples of the Pigs Used in the Project
4.0
OUTCOMES
-
Flows increased by more than 20%
- Lower
operational pressures
-
Project partially completed within budget ($22k for
Pigging Contractor as per Quote) but SA Water component
of $15 k Labour and materials was over by $7k due
to the amount of time we had between stages and the
fact that it went over a weekend
- No
pipe failures due to corrosion /pressure surges in
the last 14 months since pigging of main
- No
environmental incidents
- Improvement
in pumping operation efficiency
- Savings
in operating costs
- Conservation
in electrical energy etc.
DOWNLOAD
(pdf
87 KB)
|